PAYTRAN-AD-HERE-1000-82

Appeals Court blocks Obamacare contraceptive mandate

Appeals CourtThe controversial requirement of President Obama’s affordable health-care law requiring group insurance plans to cover contraceptives, was ordered blocked by a federal appeals court. This is the first ban on enforcement of the mandate.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago returned two cases to trial courts with instructions to enter preliminary injunctions blocking enforcement of the requirement in the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The three-judge panel reversed the lower-court decisions in lawsuits brought by Catholic families and their closely held corporations in a 2-1 decision.

Friday’s decision increases the probability that the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the issue to resolve conflicting appeals court rulings. Recently, the Appeals Court in Washington ruled that this mandate may violate religious freedom along with a similar decision by the Denver Appeals Court while Appeals courts in Philadelphia and Cincinnati have upheld the law.

U.S. Circuit Judge Diane Sykes wrote in the majority opinion, “These cases — two among many currently pending in courts around the country — raise important questions about whether business owners and their closely held corporations may assert a religious objection to the contraception mandate and whether forcing them to provide this coverage substantially burdens their religious-exercise rights”.

A month ago the ACLU wrote, “This decision is a disappointment,” Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said in an e-mailed statement. The organization said it filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case. “Your boss shouldn’t be able to discriminate against you because of what he or she believes, plain and simple. People are entitled to their own religious beliefs, but they don’t have the right to impose those views on others.”

According to Edward White the lawyer representing plaintiff Cyril B. Korte, “This is an important issue to people who run these small companies and are dictated by their faith in how they should run the company.” Furthermore white said “The decision is the first appeals court ruling finding in favor of both the owners and the company, that’s important because it makes clear that either the owners or the company can sue over the mandate.”

The cases, Korte v. Sebelius, 12-3841, and Grote v. Sebelius, 13-1077, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Chicago) is clearly headed for the Supreme Court. White said. “We’re overjoyed, you have a conflict on an important national issue.”

  • richard-david-blue richard-david-blue
  • BOTTOM-AD-AD BOTTOM-AD-AD
  • paytran-bottom-border-ad paytran-bottom-border-ad

Comments

  1. ACLU – “Your boss shouldn’t be able to discriminate against you because of what he or she believes, plain and simple. People are entitled to their own religious beliefs, but they don’t have the right to impose those views on others.” …………. and you also have the right to work where your bosses views and your’s are in lockstep. If you don’t like the heat get out of the kitchen. If your boss finds this so objectionable perhaps they’ll change their business practices, but till then, it’s your choice – pay your own way for find another employer – which is how it should be anyway.

  2. wait… is that the 9th circuit I hear marching in the background….

  3. DesertRose says:

    Taking it apart piece by piece :)

Our weather forecast is from WP Wunderground